OMAHA -- Ever since the fabled golden spike was driven in 1869,
Nebraskans have been able to hop a train to California, the Omaha
World-Herald reports. They've been able to head to points east even
longer than that.
Soon that may no longer be true. In fact,
if Amtrak follows through on a contingency plan laid out late last
week, all passenger train service for people in Nebraska and Iowa
could be eliminated Oct. 1.
The only thing that can save the
money-losing cross-country routes that serve Nebraska and Iowa,
Amtrak says, is a considerable increase by Congress in the annual
subsidy to the nation's only passenger rail carrier.
Will
passenger rail service as we know it be derailed? Or is it just a
power play by Amtrak to get more money from Congress? That's the
debate that figures to play out over the next several months.
Some rail advocates say it's clear that Congress needs to
step up funding so that rail service across the country can be
expanded and improved, not eliminated.
"People in Omaha
should be getting really angry about this," said Richard Harnish,
director of a Chicago-based organization that advocates better rail
service in the Midwest.
Rep. Doug Bereuter, R-Neb., said
that regardless of what happens in Washington, he does not see the
elimination of service to Nebraska and Iowa as likely.
Bereuter, a longtime Amtrak supporter, said that if Amtrak
wants any support at all in Congress, it must remain a national rail
service.
"If they drop these long-distance routes, I will no
longer support Amtrak," he said.
Also playing into the
debate could be a report to be released today by a commission
appointed by Congress to study Amtrak and the future of U.S.
passenger rail service.
The Amtrak Reform Council will
suggest a major restructuring, including opening of some routes to
competition, along with increased federal funding.
The
council has already concluded that Amtrak - the for-profit
corporation created in 1970 to relieve railroads of the burden of
maintaining passenger service - will never become self-sufficient
under its current structure.
In the face of all the
scrutiny, Amtrak served notice Friday that it may discontinue 18
money-losing cross-country routes.
Among routes on the
potential hit list is the California Zephyr, a Chicago-to-Oakland
train that rolls daily across Iowa and Nebraska, with stops in Mount
Pleasant, Ottumwa, Osceola, Creston, Omaha, Lincoln, Hastings,
Holdrege and McCook.
Also included is the Southwest Chief,
which stops in Fort Madison, in Iowa's southeast corner, on its
daily run between Chicago and Los Angeles.
Such cuts would
leave Nebraska and Iowa completely without passenger rail service,
but they certainly wouldn't be alone.
In fact, the only
Amtrak service left nationally under the cuts would be lines running
along the East and West Coasts and some regional service connecting
out of Chicago.
"We don't want this to happen and would work
like the dickens to keep this from happening," said Amtrak spokesman
Kevin Johnson. "Something has to happen between now and October."
Amtrak said the only way it would keep the targeted routes
running is if its subsidy from Congress for 2003 is more than
doubled, to $1.2 billion. Even a $1billion subsidy would not prevent
elimination of the routes, Amtrak says.
President Bush's
proposed budget would leave Amtrak funding at $521 million, the same
amount set for the past three years. Congress will take up the issue
in the months ahead.
Dan Lutz of Lincoln, president of
ProRail Nebraska, an organization that supports passenger service in
the state, said the group will be lobbying all members of Nebraska's
congressional delegation to preserve Amtrak service.
"There
are people who can't fly, don't want to fly or are afraid to fly,"
he said. "This is a form of mass transportation we need to
preserve."