Recently both the Union Pacific and Burlington Northern Santa
Fe Railroads engaged in massive job cuts in order to pump up their bottom line for the
investing community. As usual, these cost savings fell on those of us who produce the
wealth and create the value these companies have to investors. However, we have our own
bottom line of income and job security, the Feb. 7 Job Protection Agreement, that gives us
some protection against the financial manipulations of these mega-carriers.
Recently, Special Board of Adjustment No. 1087, created by the BMWE and the National
Carriers Conference Committee (NCCC) as the exclusive forum for deciding questions about
the Job Protection Agreement, issued several important decisions related to the scope of
the guarantees provided under the Agreement and the means to claim those guarantees.
There are two types of protected employees under the Feb. 7 Agreement--
regularly assigned and seasonal.
A regularly assigned, protected employee is one who held a bulletined assignment on
September 26, 1996, or who later obtained a regular assignment, and who is not
seasonal. A regularly assigned employee carries a protected rate that is the rate of the
job held on September 26, 1996 or the date he or she reached ten years of service. (On
BNSF only, the carrier was permitted by SBA No. 1087 to classify certain regularly
assigned employees as multi-rate protected based upon their employment histories during
1993, 1994, and 1995. The next issue of the Journal will contain an article
explaining the application of the multi-rate guarantee on BNSF.) That protected rate is
increased by all subsequent general wage increases.
A seasonal employee is an employee who averaged less than 11 days of employment in any
one month during the calendar years 1993, 1994, and 1995. (Example: Employee "A"
worked 2 days in January 1993, 10 days in January 1994, and 15 days in January 1995 for a
total of 27 days worked in January over 3 years. That figure divided by 3 provides an
average of 9 days worked in January 1993-1995. Employee "A" is a seasonal
employee.) The difference in classification between regularly assigned and seasonal
affects the level of protection provided under the Agreement.
Regularly assigned employees are guaranteed full-time employment and compensation at
their guaranteed rate for the rest of their railroad career. The guarantee is removed only
through death, resignation, dismissal for cause or failure to obtain or retain a position
through the exercise of seniority.
A regularly assigned employee has 60 days from the end of the month in which he or she
claims compensation to file a claim for benefits. Any regularly assigned employee who was
forced to a lower-rated position as a result of these job cuts has a claim for the
difference between his or her protected rate and the rate of the position currently held.
If you are regularly assigned and could not hold a job, you have a claim both for the
wages you lost and for reinstatement to a full-time, regularly assigned position.
Seasonal employees are guaranteed in each calendar year the same number of days worked
in 1997. Seasonal employees also have a protected rate, that is the rate of the job you
held on September 1996 or whenever you obtain 10 years of service with a carrier.
SBA No. 1087 determined that seasonal employees must submit their claims for
compensation at the end of each calendar year. The following examples are for claims by
seasonal employees: Employee A is seasonal and worked 150 days in 1997 and has a protected
rate as a Machine Operator at $16.00 per hour. If Employee A works 160 days in 1998, he or
she has no claim. If Employee A works 145 days in 1998, he or she has a claim for 5 days
(8 hours a day) at $16.00. Finally, if Employee A worked 150 days in 1997 but all of them
were at the Trackman's rate, Employee "A" has no claim for compensation
because the carrier provided him or her with 150 days of work opportunity during the year.
We are negotiating an amended claims handling procedure to deal with the seasonal
guarantee claims following SBA's No. 1087 decisions. Next month's Journal will
provide an update on that grievance procedure. |