The
latest check-up on the U.S. economy shows the proverbial "man behind the
curtain" in the Emerald City called Wall Street. While recent stock fluctuations may
have caused a few nervous moments, on the whole, those who play the market are still
living the high life. Unfortunately, the same cannot be said for the rest of us. The
Economic Policy Institute's biennial check of the country's economic pulse, finds American
workers where they always are: toiling to enrich the pockets of big business tycoons. But it's like we're mice on a treadmill; despite how hard we're
working, we keep falling behind.
The erosion of our living standards isn't news to any of us. But seeing that erosion
tabulated in black-and-white, added all up and set in the cold stone of graphs and charts
can be a little unsettling.
The study finds that the living standards of most working families still have not
recovered from the recession of the early 1990s. What little relief we've felt comes from
low inflation, not any true upswing in real wages. Instead, wage stagnation remains a
reality as productivity gains are hoarded by employers, not shared with workers. Or, more disturbing, income growth comes from working longer
hours--an additional six weeks annually in a typical family since 1989.
The new economy is ushering in a new type of job: one with less security and lower
wages and benefits. Only 35.4 percent of workers reported in 1996 keeping the same job for
at least 10 years, down from 41 percent in 1979. Those who find new work after losing a
job experience, on average, a 13 percent drop in pay; one in every four no longer have
health insurance.
Meanwhile, the rich keep fattening their bank accounts. The typical middle-class family
had nearly 3 percent less wealth in 1997 than 1989 because the richest 10 percent of U.S.
households reaped 85.8 percent of the stock market's growth since 1989. That helped the
share of national wealth held by the top 1 percent of the population to rise from 34.7
percent in 1989 to 39.1 percent in 1997. At the same time, the wealthiest 1 percent saw
their tax bills drop by $36,710 since 1977.
Younger families and entry-level workers have been hard hit by wage declines. Young
workers start off with low wages and don't have the opportunity their parents did to pull
themselves up the ladder.
Maintenance of way workers know what it's like to play catch up; with deregulation and
downsizing, we've been going through this entire cycle for the last two decades. Only in
the last contract did we begin to see some relief -- and even then it is only comparative
to how far we had fallen behind.
We all want the U.S. economy to keep growing. We also want to see our employers stay
profitable. The question is how those profits and that growth is shared. The one lesson we
have learned is that those who have the wealth aren't going to spontaneously give some of
it up.
Unions and collective bargaining contracts are a key part of the equation. The decline
in union density is a primary reason for dropping wages. Including benefits, the
"union premium" was 36 percent above the combined values of wages and benefits
for non-union workers. If unions were stronger -- i.e., had more members and mobilized
more members -- that number would be even higher.
As union members and workers, it is our responsibility to understand how the economic
system works and how we can change it to make it work better for us. A strong economy and
fair treatment for workers are not mutually exclusive. We
must learn that fact and become more vocal in stopping that downward spiral, even if it
happens in so-called "good times." After all, we can't tap our heels three times
and go home to Kansas. We're stuck in this economy and have to give it a heart and make it
work for us, not just our bosses. |