Once again, a New York Dock arbitrator gave the
carriers everything they wanted in an implementing agreement. On January 14, 1999, William
E. Fredenberger, Jr. decided the New York Dock dispute between BMWE, Norfolk
Southern, CSXT and Conrail by imposing the carriers' proposal word for word. The decision
creates huge new seniority districts on CSXT and Norfolk Southern and permits the carriers
to subcontract work without notice related to implementation of their Operating Plan. "This
unjust and mean-spirited decision," said President Fleming, "works a terrible
hardship on BMWE members and appears motivated by anti-union animus in the arbitrator's
assault on seniority district size and subcontracting."
The BMWE did not agree to select Fredenberger to hear the case; he was appointed over
our objections by the National Mediation Board. Instead, the BMWE asked the NMB for a list
of seven arbitrators from which the union and the carriers would alternatively strike
names. "If we had been given such a list and Fredenberger's name had been on it, we
would have struck him," said President Fleming. "We do not consider him a fair
or impartial arbitrator in this area," he added.
The BMWE appealed Fredenberger's decision to the Surface Transportation Board on
February 12, 1999 and asked for a stay of the award on February 22, 1999. The carriers
have until March 12, 1999 to respond to the appeal and request for stay.
"Grand Lodge and the involved systems are mobilizing to ensure that all affected
employees receive every penny due them under New York Dock," said Fleming.
Recently, system officers of the involved roads met with Grand Lodge staff and mapped a
strategy to respond to the Award. "The mobilizations around New York Dock
claims and the filing of our appeal are only the first steps in BMWE's resistance to this
unjust and mean-spirited award," said Fleming.
CSXT and Norfolk Southern recently announced they would carve-up Conrail on June 1,
1999.
At press time, BNSF has threatened to file a New York Dock notice if they lose
an arbitration with BMWE designed to reduce the number of BNSF seniority districts from 47
to 9. They state flatly that if BMWE does not agree to such a reduction in seniority
districts, EVEN IF BMWE WINS THE ARBITRATION TAKING PLACE UNDER THE COLLECTIVE BARGAINING
AGREEMENT, they will simply file a notice with the STB based on the Fredenberger Award to
get a second, more sympathetic, bite at the apple before a New York Dock
arbitrator. They simply believe they have the right to ignore the contracts because the
STB will allow them to do whatever they want. |