New FRA and CSX Safety Compliance Agreement
Announced
A 60% increase in track-caused accidents over five years on the
22,700-mile CSX system running through 23 states prompted the Federal
Railroad Administration to initiate a two-week systemwide track audit
on February 22, 2000.
The FRA first became concerned about track conditions on CSX in
1997 because reportable track-caused train accidents had increased to
86 from 54 in 1996. At that time, FRA undertook a comprehensive review
of CSX tracks under the auspices of FRA's Safety Assurance and
Compliance Program (SACP). As a result of that audit, CSX produced an
action plan to improve track maintenance and inspection practices.
The FRA continued to carefully monitor track conditions on CSX and
in 1998 saw signs of improvement - the ratio of track defects detected
during FRA inspections on CSX declined 12.5%. However, the number of
track caused accidents actually saw a slight increase.
Overall 1999 was the safest year in CSX history. For the first time
in a decade, CSX had no employee fatalities. Fifty-one employee
fatalities had occurred in the previous ten years. CSX also led all
Class 1 railroads with a 16.4% reduction in grade crossing collisions
in 1999.
Despite these safety achievements in 1999, the FRA was still
concerned about the lack of improvement in track safety. While the
rate of track-caused accidents declined in 1999, the decline was
minimal and not to FRA's satisfaction (1.05 in 1998 compared to 1.04
in 1999).
So FRA intensified its surveillance of CSX track by increasing its
inspection activity by 23%.
"The problem is almost to an emergency state," Randall
Brassell, BMWE Vice Chairman told Richmond Times-Dispatch reporter
Chip Jones in April of this year. Conditions have deteriorated for
years, Brassell said, but the problem was exacerbated by CSX's
cost-cutting last year to cover the billions of dollars expense of
buying part of Conrail. As a result, "the carrier is not putting
enough money into maintenance or equipment" and in fact, recently
cut 200 track maintenance workers.
"We believe we are putting dollars into the system," said
CSX spokesman Robert L. Gould. The company spent $4 billion on capital
improvements during the past four years, much of it for track
maintenance, he said. "We're not in an emergency state. The
railroad is safe. I ride it each day between Baltimore and
Washington."
Of even more concern than the number of track defects was the nature
of the track defects said George Gavalla, FRA associate administrator
for safety. "When you look at the nature of the defects, these
are conditions that should not exist on any major railroad,"
Gavalla told the Washington Post.
Gavalla's comments stemmed from the fact that the leading cause of
track-caused derailments was wide gauge, which as maintenance of way
workers know, is a condition in which the distance between the rails
exceeds the allowable standards. "We will not tolerate wide gauge
on any railroad," said Gavalla.
The second leading cause of track related derailments was found to
be defective switch points and track hardware at turnouts. Both of
these types of track-caused derailments are easily preventable.
Because these conditions were the leading causes of track related
derailments, the FRA believed they indicated a lack of quality in
CSX's track inspection and track maintenance practices and thus,
initiated the audit on February 22.
Forty-four federal and state inspectors engaged in a two week
system-wide track safety audit that covered approximately 15% of CSX's
total track. In addition, nine listening sessions were conducted with
CSX employees, labor leaders and supervisors from the track and bridge
departments all across the CSX system.
The track audit revealed that while track conditions had improved
on some CSX divisions, others showed only marginal improvement and
some showed deterioration in track conditions. The findings confirmed
FRA's belief in the need for improved quality control measures to
focus on the nature of the track defects.
In a meeting on March 15 to discuss FRA's preliminary findings and
concerns, John Snow, CSX Chairman, committed to Jolene Molitoris, FRA
Administrator, that he would address FRA's track related concerns. At
the same time a senior delegation from the FRA met with then-CSX
President Ron Conway and senior engineering department officials to
discuss FRA's findings in more detail. Conway called the conditions
"unacceptable" and said, "whatever is necessary to do,
we'll do."
As a result of these discussions, CSX agreed to enter into a
compliance agreement with FRA to address the track quality control
issues identified. A compliance agreement is a "legally binding
document that commits the railroad to implement safety measures above
and beyond what is required by regulations in order to facilitate
compliance with those rules," said the FRA.
The CSX Compliance Agreement calls for a number of measures to be
taken, including:
- Automated track inspections using CSX's three track geometry
vehicles up to three times per year; ...
- Visual track inspections within 60 days; ...
- Performance standards for large scale track work; ...
- Enhanced management oversight; ...
- Capital improvement and maintenance programs for track for the
years 2000 through 2004; ...
- Notice to affected employees by distributing a copy of the
Compliance Agreement; ...
- Payment of penalties for unacceptable conditions; ...
- Violations of the agreement permit the FRA to issue an emergency
order or compliance order and CSX will not contest the issuance of
such an order.
At a roundtable with reporters held in Jacksonville, Florida on
April 20, Molitoris and Snow announced the signing and execution of
the CSX Safety Compliance Agreement which will remain in effect until
May 1, 2001 unless FRA decides by January 31, 2001 that CSX has made
sufficient progress.
The Journal of Commerce reported that Snow "expressed
confidence that clear and decisive actions to correct track conditions
and maintenance processes will convince the FRA to end its oversight
before May 1 next year."
At the roundtable, after noting that BMWE has a vested interest in
the long term viability of the railroad because its fate is
intrinsically related to the fate of the railroad industry, BMWE
President Mac A. Fleming assured CSX "that BMWE-represented
employees possess the skills, dedication and know-how to bring this
railroad back into compliance with FRA and industry standards ... and
make it the safest and most efficient railroad in North America."
Fleming commended CSX "for stepping up to the plate and
publicly acknowledging that problems do exist" and reminded CSX
that "the highly skilled and dedicated employees at CSX are your
most valuable asset in turning things around. Give us the manpower and
the materials and we will get the job done," he promised.
Fleming urged CSX "to accelerate hiring in the maintenance of
way department and decrease the use of outside contractors" whose
commitment to the railroad does not come close to matching that of its
own employees. He also urged CSX to replenish their depleted section
forces to complement production crews, improve quality control, and
most importantly, to maintain the integrity of the track structure
between programmed renewal by highly mechanized production forces.
"High-tonnage Class 1 railroads the size of CSX cannot
maintain their track infrastructure with roving production forces
alone. It is essential that adequate section forces be in place to
maintain track integrity and to facilitate inspection and repairs
before conditions pose a safety risk or constitute a FRA
violation."
"There is muted concern at FRA that deferred maintenance born
of clipped expenditures could be on the increase. That's why the CSX
track defects have triggered alarm bells," reported Frank Wilner
in the April 10 issue of Traffic World.
"Major railroads went on a spending spree to acquire other
railroads. CSX and Norfolk Southern paid more than $10 billion in
borrowed cash for Conrail two years ago and absorbed another $10
billion in Conrail debt. Since the transaction was consummated, the
stock prices of both CSX and NS have tumbled more than 55 percent.
With bonuses of officials and even their job security tied to earnings
and stock price, pressure to spend less now is intense," Wilner
wrote.
"Every roadmaster and division superintendent on every
railroad I speak to is sweating blood and some can't sleep at night
worrying that they're not being allocated the materials and labor
forces they need," said Rick Inclima, BMWE Director of Safety in
the same article.
"FRA safety expert Ed English confirms CSX and other railroads
have created large and heavily mechanized production gangs that can
total 80 workers and roam 1,000 miles of track. They have replaced
six- and 12-person section crews that previously had responsibility
for track segments not exceeding 60 miles. Big production gangs can
lay and realign track and replace crossties and not come back for a
few years 'if you get a quality job when the gang goes through,' said
English. 'If the job is not done right the first time - if little
things are not done - there aren't the little gangs to bring back in'
to check up on the big production gang that has moved on. The nature
of the defects found on CSX main lines 'makes us nervous,' said
English."
The FRA said CSX employed fewer maintenance workers per mile of
track than other major systems in 1999. "They've reduced section
forces so low it's like the little Dutch boy with his finger in the
hole," said Inclima. "Not only has the number of section
crews been reduced, the remaining crews have as few as two workers to
repair problems. The absence of section crews hinders quality control
behind the large production gangs, further affecting track quality.
Meanwhile, CSX has been regularly sub-contracting core maintenance
of way of work to outside contractors, filing over 450 contracting
notices with the BMWE between June 1 and December 31, 1999. After many
meetings with CSX over this issue, it was clear to the BMWE that CSX
was doing nothing to stop the "avalanche of sub-contracting"
which was a unilateral change in the collective bargaining agreement.
A strike over this issue planned for March 10 was prevented by
Florida District Court Judge Nimmons. At that time, Perry Geller, BMWE
General Chairman, noted that CSX's "actions not only harm our
members and their families but place the communities at risk. CSX's
choice to utilize unqualified contractor forces instead of its highly
skilled BMWE forces creates unsafe passage of trains, thereby
increasing the risk to the public."
On February 15, 2000, the Philadelphia Inquirer reported that
Darby, Pennsylvania Mayor Paula M. Brown had used her car and a police
car to block the tracks in downtown Darby for more than 12 hours on
February 13 until CSX agreed to provide more information about
derailments in or bordering the city. Brown contended that CSX's
documents indicated five derailments occurred in the first two weeks
of February while a CSX spokesman said there were only three.
"At the site of the latest derailment," reported the
Inquirer, "Brown said yesterday that railroad officials expressed
greater concern for freight on those trains than for borough
residents. 'These people were more concerned about some Tropicana
orange juice getting to New York City than they were about the safety
of these people,' Brown said. 'That is unacceptable.'
"Since CSX absorbed much of the Conrail system two years ago,
residents' complaints have increased about malfunctioning grade
crossing signals, standing trains that block traffic, and most
recently, the safety of the trains. Missed deadlines, shipping delays,
and delivery problems have plagued CSX's rail business since the
Conrail deal," the Inquirer stated.
Since last Fall, citizens in Ohio have also registered numerous
complaints of CSX blocking crossings - often for more than three
hours. Local newspapers all over the state have reported that school
children have crawled under standing trains at crossings in order to
get to school.
Legislators in Ohio are investigating these complaints while
discussing what action they can take and Ohio Governor Taft has
publicly expressed his concern about the situation. |